Dingo investment

I am writing in response to Bronwyn Hasting’s article, ‘Dingo decision divides’, published on October 2. 

As a local researcher dedicated to studying the dingo population in the Big Desert for over four years, I feel compelled to address the inaccuracies and misconceptions presented in the article.

Firstly, the term ‘wild dog’ is a misnomer. It is important to clarify the animals in question are dingoes, specifically pure dingoes with no recent dog ancestry, as confirmed by extensive genetic testing conducted by Dr Kylie Cairns and Cesar Australia. 

Mr Bennett’s (Lawloit farmer Alan Bennett) assertion regarding limited population research is unfounded and misleading. 

I have personally invested significant time and resources into studying dingoes in the Big Desert, including the deployment and management of over 50 trail cameras. 

The recent population estimates are based on a comprehensive approach involving multiple research methods, including genetic analysis and camera studies.

The genetic research has revealed a concerning level of inbreeding among the dingoes in the Big Desert, posing a significant threat to their survival. 

This inbreeding suggests a limited breeding population, reinforcing the need for conservation measures.

Mr Bennett’s claim that trappers do not use lures is inaccurate. 

While baits may not be the primary method for attracting dingoes to traps, leg-hold traps are often used in conjunction with lures to increase their effectiveness. 

Both methods cause immense suffering for dingoes and non-target species. 

Leg-hold traps can cause broken limbs, while 1080 baits take hours to kill, causing prolonged agony.

It is crucial to consider the broader ecological implications of removing dingoes. 

Their presence helps regulate populations of herbivores like kangaroos and emus, mitigating potential damage to crops and overgrazing of native grasses. 

Additionally, dingoes play a vital role in controlling feral animals, such as goats, foxes, and feral cats, which can have detrimental effects on our smaller native mammal populations.

Another consideration that livestock producers are failing to acknowledge is the cultural significance of Wilkerr (dingoes) for the People of the Wotjobaluk Nations, the local Traditional Owners. 

As a totem species, Wilkerr hold deep cultural value for the Wotjobaluk People. 

Their public opposition to the lethal control of Wilkerr should be respected by livestock producers.

Ellisha Martion

Founder

Big Desert Dingo Research

The entire October 16, 2024 edition of The Weekly Advertiser is available online. READ IT HERE!